Contents:
- Postcolonialism and the "Heritagization" of the Post-Structural Interval
- Universal Modernism and the Free World Industrial Settlement
- De-Industrial Heritagization and the Dimensions of Modernism
- Universal Modernism as a Solution Set for Global Development
- Related Articles
- External Weblinks
Postcolonialism and the "Heritagization" of the Post-Structural Interval
Postcolonialism is not merely a historical period but an ongoing process of grappling with the legacies of colonialism. It involves the deconstruction of colonial narratives and the assertion of diverse cultural identities. The "heritagization" of the post-structural interval refers to the ways in which postcolonial societies are redefining their cultural heritage by incorporating elements of both pre-colonial traditions and modern influences. This process involves a critical re-evaluation of history and the creation of new narratives that challenge colonial perspectives.
Universal Modernism and the Free World Industrial Settlement
Universal Modernism represents a globalized vision of modernity that transcends the limitations of Western-centric models. It embraces the diversity of cultural expressions and acknowledges the interconnectedness of the world. This concept is closely linked to the Free World Industrial Settlement, a vision of a post-abundant and post-political 21st century characterized by microeconomic liberalization and globalized markets.
Universal Modernism is seen as "fully sentient and adaptive" to the challenges of the 21st century, including the environmental and social consequences of globalization. It recognizes the need for sustainable development and equitable distribution of resources.
De-Industrial Heritagization and the Dimensions of Modernism
De-industrial heritagization is a key aspect of Universal Modernism. It involves the commodification and repurposing of former industrial sites and landscapes as cultural heritage assets and new priorities for Design Systems Manufacturing (DSM) for the Human Energy Framework (HEF), reflecting a desire to preserve cultural memory and adapt to the changing economic landscape. This process has three key dimensions:
(a) Characterization of Regional Modernism/Just Modernism (geographic)
This dimension emphasizes the importance of recognizing and valuing diverse forms of modernity that have emerged in different regions of the world. It challenges the notion of a single, universal model of modernity and promotes a more inclusive and equitable approach to development.
(b) Capitalization of Local and Tropical Modernisms (structural)
This dimension focuses on the economic potential of de-industrial heritagization. By transforming former industrial sites into cultural and tourist attractions, local communities can generate income and revitalize their economies.
(c) Commodification of Cosmopolitan and Postcolonial Modernisms (cultural)
This dimension highlights the cultural significance of de-industrial heritagization. By preserving and showcasing industrial heritage, postcolonial societies can reclaim their history and assert their cultural identity in a globalized world.
Universal Modernism as a Solution Set for Global Development
Universal Modernism offers a comprehensive framework for addressing the challenges of postcolonialism and promoting sustainable development. By embracing diversity, promoting equity, and adapting to the changing global landscape, Universal Modernism can help to create a more just and prosperous world for all.
Related Articles
External Weblinks
No comments:
Post a Comment